Presenter speaking while participants take part in discussion

Article · Finance

Beyond financial literacy: what MSMEs actually need from financial institutions

Financial inclusion programmes often train enterprises to use products that do not fit them. Inclusion improves when the conversation runs in both directions.

Gabriel Fiatui26 May 20266 min read
WOEF Corporate Project

A large share of financial inclusion work is delivered as one-way instruction: enterprises are taught what banking, insurance and pension products exist and how to apply. That is necessary, but incomplete.

Enterprises encounter three practical barriers. Products are structured for repayment patterns that do not match seasonal or contract-driven revenue. Documentation requirements assume records the business has never been asked to keep. And the cost of failure — collateral, guarantors, reputational exposure — is concentrated on the borrower.

Programmes that convene both sides produce better results. When institutions hear how a poultry business or a shea aggregator actually earns money, product terms and appraisal approaches can adjust. When enterprises understand how appraisal works, they prepare differently.

Insurance and pension uptake follow a similar logic. Adoption rises when the product is explained against a risk the owner has already experienced — a fire, a flooded store, an illness that stopped trading — rather than as an abstract obligation.

Inclusion is best measured not by accounts opened but by whether enterprises are still using the product, and still solvent, a year later.

Key points

  • Product design mismatch, not ignorance, is a primary barrier to uptake.
  • Convening enterprises and institutions together improves both appraisal and preparation.
  • Measure retained, productive usage rather than accounts opened.

Start here

Let's build something sustainable.

Tell us what you are working on. We will tell you honestly whether we are the right team for it.

Start a Conversation